MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2018009395 · doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6601716

Methylation analysis of the glypican 3 gene in embryonal tumours

2004· article· en· W2018009395 on OpenAlexafffund
Gino Boily, Zeina Saikali, Daniel Sinnett

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Cancer · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer-related gene regulation
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalHEC MontréalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMethylationDNA methylationBiologyMolecular biologyEpigeneticsGene expressionGeneRegulation of gene expressionPromoterGene silencingCancer researchGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have previously shown that the glypican 3 (GPC3) gene was expressed in neuroblastoma (NB) and Wilms' tumour (WT), two embryonal tumours. GPC3 is an X-linked gene that has its peak expression during development and that is downregulated in all investigated tissues after birth. GPC3 expression could be involved in the aetiology of embryonal tumours such as NB and WT. Methylation is known to play a role in gene silencing, notably in chromosome X inactivation. Southern blot- and PCR-based methylation assays were used to assess the methylation status of the GPC3 promoter on genomic DNA from both normal and embryonal tumour cells. In normal cells, the promoter was not methylated in males and partially methylated in females. Our results suggest that DNA methylation of the promoter region is not essential for the transcriptional repression of the GPC3 gene and that the methylation observed in females is probably linked to the inactive X chromosome. In tumour samples, methylation abnormalities have been found exclusively in female NB samples (loss of methylation) and mainly in male WT samples (gain of methylation). Overall, methylation did not significantly correlate with the expression status of GPC3. Although promoter methylation is likely to affect the expression status of the gene, our results suggest that the deregulation of GPC3 transcriptional expression seen in NB and WT involves other regulatory levels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.745
Threshold uncertainty score0.464

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of CancerSame topicCancer-related gene regulationFrench-language works237,207