Cutaneous Allodynia in Transformed Migraine Patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is growing evidence that central sensitization plays a role in migraine pathogenesis, and that cutaneous allodynia is its clinical correlate. In headache research, allodynia has largely been studied in episodic migraine. The purpose of this investigation was to determine whether cutaneous allodynia occurs in transformed migraine, using individuals without headaches as controls. METHODS: Fifteen patients with a diagnosis of transformed migraine and 15 control subjects with no history of headaches were included. All subjects were females between 18 and 50. Similar to the methods of Burstein et al, Von Frey hairs (VFH) were sequentially applied to territories supplied by divisions of the trigeminal nerve, cervical paraspinal muscles, trapezius muscles, ventral forearm, and lower leg to determine a pain threshold. As a milder stimulus, a cotton swab was stroked in the same locations. Each trial was repeated 3 times on 2 occasions. Group comparisons were made using the Student's t-test. RESULTS: Mean pain thresholds were lower among migraine patients than control subjects across all test areas. The thresholds were statistically significantly lower in migraine patients than in control subjects for the 1st division of the trigeminal nerve (34.0 g versus 115.8 g, P= .035) and for the 2nd division (23.5 g versus 97.6 g, P= .039). Six patients found a cotton swab-stroke painful, compared to zero control subjects. Using a quantitative definition of allodynia, 75% of patients had allodynia to mechanical stimuli. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to demonstrate allodynia in transformed migraine patients using a headache-free control population and supports the hypothesis that central sensitization plays a role in the evolution of transformed migraine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".