MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2018124429 · doi:10.1364/josab.30.001637

Complete pump depletion by autoresonant second harmonic generation in a nonuniform medium

2013· article· en· W2018124429 on OpenAlexafffund
Oded Yaakobi, Matteo Clerici, Lucia Caspani, François Vidal, Roberto Morandotti

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Optical Society of America B · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Fiber Laser Technologies
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies
KeywordsHarmonicPhysicsAmplitudeSecond-harmonic generationWidebandEnergy (signal processing)Stability (learning theory)Function (biology)Mathematical analysisMathematicsOpticsQuantum mechanicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we develop for the first time to our knowledge an analytical theory of second harmonic generation (SHG) in a generic nonuniform χ(2) medium. It is shown that by varying the properties of the medium gradually enough, the system can enter an autoresonant state in which the phases of the fundamental pump and of the generated second harmonic wave are locked. The effect of autoresonance allows efficient transfer of energy between the waves and, due to the continuous phase-locking in the system, all the energy of the pump could be converted to the second harmonic. Simple closed-form expressions for the waves amplitudes as a function of the longitudinal coordinate are derived, and an explicit criterion for the stability of the autoresonant state is obtained. Our analytical theory is compared to the numerical solution of the coupled mode equations, which are found to be in excellent agreement with each other. The analytical closed-form expressions that we derive could be very useful for practical design of SHG devices with increased performances, such as highly efficient, wideband frequency converters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.231
Threshold uncertainty score0.276

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Optical Society of America BSame topicAdvanced Fiber Laser TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207