MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2018125673 · doi:10.1088/0954-3899/29/8/391

Non-neutrino physics working group summary

2003· article· en· W2018125673 on OpenAlexaff
J.-M. Poutissou, K. Yoshimura

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics G Nuclear and Particle Physics · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNeutrino Physics Research
Canadian institutionsTRIUMF
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeutrino FactoryNeutrinoMuonPhysicsParticle physicsNuclear physicsSelection (genetic algorithm)Flux (metallurgy)Neutrino oscillationComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This summary covers the physics topics that could benefit from the unprecedented flux of muons produced at the front end of the future neutrino factory. A selection of such opportunities was presented at NuFact02 and their demands on beam properties were evaluated. This summary will survey the rare muon decay experiments and the high precision measurements that could benefit from higher fluxes as well as some of the new programmes that could use very large μ − fluxes. A number of technological developments relevant to the neutrino factories were also discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.078
Threshold uncertainty score0.260

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0780.073

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics G Nuclear and Particle PhysicsSame topicNeutrino Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207