Analytical synthesis and comparison of voltage‐mode<i>N</i>th‐order OTA‐C universal filter structures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SUMMARY Complementary single‐ended‐input operational transconductance amplifier (OTA)‐based filter structures are introduced in this paper. Through two analytical synthesis methods and two transformations, one of which is to convert a differential‐input OTA to two complementary single‐ended‐input OTAs, and the other to convert a single‐ended‐input OTA and grounded capacitor‐based one to a fully differential OTA‐based one, four distinct kinds of voltage‐mode n th‐order OTA‐C universal filter structures are proposed. TSMC H‐Spice simulations with 0.35µm process validate that the new complementary single‐ended‐input OTA‐based one holds the superiority in output precision, dynamic and linear ranges than other kinds of filter structures. Moreover, the new voltage‐mode band‐pass, band‐reject and all‐pass (except the fully differential one) biquad structures, all enjoy very low sensitivities. Both direct sixth‐order universal filter structures and their equivalent three biquad stage ones are also simulated and validated that the former is not absolutely larger in sensitivity than the latter. Finally, a very sharp increment of the transconductance of an OTA is discovered as the operating frequency is very high and leads to a modified frequency‐dependent transconductance. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".