Synthesis and thermolysis rate constants of diastereomeric oxadiazoline sources of acetoxy(methoxy)carbene — Reaction of acetoxy(methoxy)carbene with isocyanates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Oxidation of the methoxycarbonylhydrazone of p-methoxyacetophenone affords both the cis- and trans-2-acetoxy-2-methoxy-5-(p-methoxyphenyl)-5-methyl-Δ3-1,3,4-oxadiazolines (also known as corresponding 2,5-dihydro-1,3,4-oxadiazoles) as well as methyl 1-acetoxy-1-(p-methoxyphenylethyl)diazenecarboxylate. The three isomers were separated and identified by spectroscopic means. Methyl 1-acetoxy-1-(p-methoxyphenylethyl)diazenecarboxylate is the major product from oxidation in dichloromethane. Oxidation in acetic acid did not afford the oxadiazolines but gave the diazenecarboxylate and, in addition, 1-(p-methoxyphenyl)ethyl acetate. Attempts to isomerize the diazenecar boxylate to the oxadiazolines by acid catalysis were not successful. Thermolysis of the oxadiazolines at 50.4 °C occurred with approximately the same rate constant (ca. 3.6 × 10–5 s–1) to afford acetoxy(methoxy)carbene, which rearranges to methyl pyruvate by acetyl transfer. The carbene, which reacts with relatively unhindered isocyanates to transfer the methoxy carbonyl group to carbon and the acetyl group to nitrogen, can be considered an acyl anion equivalent in that reaction.Key words: acetoxy(methoxy)carbene, diazene, oxadiazoline, isocyanate, (acetylamino)oxoacetate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".