MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2018167445 · doi:10.3138/cjh.49.1.31

L’embrigadement du passé canadien : Les politiques mémorielles du gouvernement Harper

2014· article· fr· W2018167445 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Yves Frénette

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of History · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans ce commentaire critique sur les usages politiques de la mémoire dans le Canada contemporain, l’auteur se penche sur l’embrigadement du passé canadien par le gouvernement de Stephen Harper, depuis son accession au pouvoir en 2006. Il montre comment la reconstruction du passé de la nation s’inscrit dans la volonté refondatrice des conservateurs et il présente les stratégies déployées par ces derniers pour refaire l’histoire du Canada à leur image : mise en exergue des liens unissant les Canadiens à la monarchie et de l’histoire militaire, tentative de faire de la Guerre de 1812 et de la Première Guerre mondiale des événements fondateurs du Canada moderne, création du Musée canadien de l’histoire. En parallèle, l’auteur présente le démantèlement dont est victime Bibliothèque et Archives Canada, le principal dépositaire de la mémoire canadienne.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.504
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of HistorySame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207