MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2018169612 · doi:10.1080/15567240802592134

DESPU: Dynamic Optimization for Energy Systems Planning Under Uncertainty

2011· article· en· W2018169612 on OpenAlex
Qianguo Lin, Guohe Huang, B. Bass, Yuefei Huang, Xiaodong Zhang

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy Sources Part B Economics Planning and Policy · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWater resources management and optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ReginaImpactUniversity of TorontoEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSizingInterval (graph theory)Mathematical optimizationFuzzy logicEnergy (signal processing)Computer scienceInteger programmingEnergy systemOperations researchDynamic programmingEngineeringMathematicsArtificial intelligenceStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The planning of energy systems is associated with various uncertainties. Such uncertainties may only be expressed by interval numbers or fuzzy sets rather than probability distributions. In addition, issues of capacity expansion related to timing, sizing and siting under such uncertainties needs to be addressed. Therefore, the objective of this research is to develop a dynamic optimization model for energy systems planning under uncertainty (DESPU) through integrating interval-parameter, fuzzy and mixed integer programming techniques within an energy systems management framework. The developed methodology is then applied to a hypothetical regional energy system. The results indicate that DESPU has advantages in reflecting complexities of various uncertainties as well as dealing with problems of capacity expansion within energy systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.768
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it