Startle response of human neck muscles sculpted by readiness to perform ballistic head movements
Bibliographic record
Abstract
1. An acoustic startle stimulus delivered in place of a 'go' signal in a voluntary reaction time (RT) task has been shown previously to advance the onset latency of a prepared distal limb movement without affecting the amplitude of the muscle response or movement kinematics. The primary goal of this study was to use muscles with a larger startle response to investigate whether the startling stimulus only triggered the RT movement or whether some form of interaction occurred between a startle response and a temporally advanced RT movement. 2. Twenty healthy male or female subjects were instructed to react as quickly as possible to an acoustic 'go' stimulus by performing a ballistic head flexion or right axial rotation. The 'go' stimulus was periodically replaced by an acoustic stimulus capable of eliciting a startle reflex. Separate startle-inducing stimuli under relaxed conditions before and after the movement trials served as control trials (CT trials). Bilateral surface electromyography of the orbicularis oculi, masseter, sternocleidomastoid and cervical paraspinal muscles, and head-mounted transducers were used to measure the muscle response and movement kinematics. 3. Muscle activation times in startled movement trials (ST trials) were about half those observed in RT trials, and were not significantly different from those observed in the startle CT trials. The duration of head acceleration was longer in ST trials than in RT trials and the amplitude of both the neck muscle electromyogram (EMG) and head kinematics was larger during ST trials than during RT trials. The EMG amplitude of ST trials was biased upward rather than scaled upward compared with the EMG amplitude of RT trials. 4. Over the 14 ST trials used in this experiment, no habituation of the reflex response was observed in the muscles studied. This absence of habituation was attributed to a combination of motor readiness and sensory facilitation. 5. The results of this experiment indicated that the neck muscle response evoked by a startling acoustic stimulus in the presence of motor readiness could be described as a facilitated startle reflex superimposed on a temporally advanced, pre-programmed, voluntary RT movement. Parallel reticular pathways to the neck muscle motoneurones are proposed as a possible explanation for the apparent summation of the startle and voluntary movement responses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".