Replacing the general energy-coupling proteins of the phospho-<i>enol</i>-pyruvate:sugar phosphotransferase system of<i>Salmonella typhimurium</i>with fructose-inducible counterparts results in the inability to utilize nonphosphotransferase system sugars
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A Salmonella typhimurium mutant lacking Enzyme I and HPr, general proteins of the phosphoenolpyruvate:sugar phosphotransferase system (PTS), but producing homologues EI(Fructose) and FPr constitutively, did not grow in minimal medium supplemented with non-PTS sugars (melibiose, glycerol, and maltose) in the absence of any trace of Luria-Bertani broth; adding cyclic AMP allowed growth. On melibiose, rapid growth began only when melibiose permease activity had reached a threshold level. Wild-type cultures reached this level within about 2 h, but the mutant only after a 12-14 h lag period, and then only when cyclic AMP had been added to the medium. On a mixture of melibiose and a PTS sugar, permease was undetectable in either the wild type or mutant until the PTS sugar had been exhausted. Permease then appeared, increasing with time, but in the mutant it never reached the threshold allowing rapid growth on melibiose unless cyclic AMP had been added. On rich medium supplemented with melibiose or glycerol, the mutant produced lower (30%) levels of melibiose permease or glycerol kinase compared with the wild type. We propose that poor phosphorylation of the regulatory protein Enzyme IIA(Glucose), leading to constitutive inducer exclusion and catabolite repression in this strain, accounts for these results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".