MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2018205219 · doi:10.1029/2004jb003095

Linear and nonlinear Thellier paleointensity behavior of natural minerals

2005· article· en· W2018205219 on OpenAlexaff
David J. Dunlop, Baoxing Zhang, Özden Özdemir

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGeomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersUniversity of MinnesotaEarth Sciences DivisionNational Science Foundation
KeywordsMaficPlagioclaseGeologyThermoremanent magnetizationMineralogyMagnetiteNatural remanent magnetizationRock magnetismDemagnetizing fieldRemanenceGeophysicsGeochemistryMagnetizationQuartzPhysicsMagnetic field

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We tested single‐domain (SD) and multidomain (MD) theories of the acquisition and thermal demagnetization of thermoremanent magnetization (TRM) and partial TRM (pTRM) in Thellier paleointensity determination, using as samples plagioclase and mafic minerals extracted from Matachewan diabase dikes. Susceptibility, hysteresis, and coercivity data indicate that the plagioclase contains mainly SD grains of magnetite while the mafic minerals (clinopyroxene, biotite, and actinolite) contain mainly MD magnetite. The extracted minerals were used in simulated Thellier experiments with laboratory TRM as a proxy for natural remanent magnetization (NRM). The plagioclase behaved ideally, as predicted by Néel SD theory, giving a linear NRM‐pTRM (Arai) plot with positive pTRM checks. The mafic minerals behaved nonideally, with strongly curved Arai plots sagging below the ideal SD line, in accord with observations for MD magnetites and with predictions that in heating to moderate temperatures T , more TRM is lost than can be regained as pTRM, causing convex‐down Arai plots. In experiments with pTRM parallel to NRM, all pTRM tail checks were zero, but pTRM checks increasingly deviated from the Arai curve toward the SD line as T increased. However, in repeat Thellier experiments, pTRMs at all T agreed with the original pTRMs. The negative pTRM checks were therefore not due to physicochemical alteration but rather to departure from initial states with different magnetic histories than those of the original pTRMs. The inability of pTRM checks to reliably distinguish between MD behavior and irreversible alteration could lead to overestimates of paleointensity from straight‐line fits to the low‐ T “unaltered” part of the Arai curve or underestimates from fits to high‐ T data. Alternating field cleaning to 15 mT before each Thellier step made the Arai plot only marginally less curved. Low‐temperature demagnetization (LTD, zero‐field cycling through the 120 K Verwey transition) hardly changed the curvature of the Arai plot for pTRM parallel to NRM. For pTRM perpendicular to NRM, LTD led to an inflected Arai curve straddling the ideal SD line. Data of either form would not give reliable paleointensity values. No presently available pretreatment renders the paleointensity data of MD grains usable. SD and nearly SD grains which behave ideally in the Thellier experiment remain the only useful recorders of absolute paleointensity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.585
Threshold uncertainty score0.422

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations54
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresSame topicGeomagnetism and Paleomagnetism StudiesFrench-language works237,207