MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2018226100 · doi:10.1021/es011215r

Spectrofluorescence of Sediment Humic Substances and Historical Changes of Lacustrine Organic Matter Provenance in Response to Atmospheric Nutrient Enrichment

2002· article· en· W2018226100 on OpenAlexaff
Alexander P. Wolfe, Sujay S. Kaushal, J. Robin Fulton, Diane M. McKnight

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Science & Technology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and coastal ecosystems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Park Service
KeywordsSedimentOrganic matterProvenanceEnvironmental chemistryDiatomEnvironmental scienceNutrientBiogeochemical cycleEnvironmental changeGeologyOceanographyChemistryClimate changeGeomorphologyGeochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Humic substances were extracted from the sediments of two small alpine lakes in the Colorado Front Range and characterized by three-dimensional fluorescence spectroscopy. The fluorescence index (FI), defined as the ratio of fluorescence emitted at 450 nm to that emitted at 500 nm from an excitation wavelength of 370 nm, was computed and thereafter compared to additional sediment proxies of recent environmental change. Stratigraphic changes in both sediment C:N ratios and diatom assemblages parallel those of Fl, together indicating pronounced increases in the contribution of autochthonous organic matter to lake sediments since the mid-20th century. This result is consistent with increased algal production attributable to nutrient enrichment, given thatthe region undergoes episodic nitrogen saturation in response to anthropogenic N emission. The validation of sediment Fl measurements through comparisons with independent methods demonstrates the utility of this technique for characterizing shifts in the provenance of lake sediment organic matter arising from changing environmental conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.163
Teacher spread0.158 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations100
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental Science & TechnologySame topicMarine and coastal ecosystemsFrench-language works237,207