MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2018229773 · doi:10.1002/ijc.10991

<i>In vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i> antitumor activity of liposomal fenretinide targeted to human neuroblastoma

2003· article· en· W2018229773 on OpenAlexaff
Lizzia Raffaghello, Gabriella Pagnan, Fabio Pastorino, Emilio Cosimo, Chiara Brignole, Danilo Marimpietri, Paolo G. Montaldo, C. Gambini, Theresa M. Allen, Emil Bogenmann, Mirco Ponzoni

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Cancer · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeuroblastoma Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersAssociazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul CancroFondazione Italiana per la Lotta al Neuroblastoma
KeywordsIn vivoFenretinideIn vitroNeuroblastomaLiposomePharmacologyCancer researchMonoclonal antibodyMedicineCell cultureChemistryImmunologyRetinoidAntibodyBiologyBiochemistryRetinoic acid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neuroblastoma (NB) is the most common extracranial solid tumor of childhood. In advanced disease stages, prognosis is poor and treatments have limited efficacy, thus novel strategies are warranted. The synthetic retinoid Fenretinide (HPR) induces apoptosis in NB and melanoma cell lines. We reported an in vitro potentiation of HPR effects on melanoma cells when the drug is incorporated into GD2-targeted immunoliposomes (anti-GD2-SIL-HPR). We investigated the antitumor activity of anti-GD2-SIL-HPR against NB cells, both in vitro and in vivo. Anti-GD2-SIL showed specific, competitive binding to and uptake by, various NB cell lines. In in vitro cytotoxicity studies, NB cells, incubated with 30 microM HPR entrapped in anti-GD2-immunoliposomes, showed a significant reduction in cellular growth compared to free HPR, HPR entrapped in Ab-free liposomes or anti-GD2 empty liposomes. In an in vivo NB metastatic model, we demonstrated that anti-GD2-SIL-HPR completely inhibited the development of macroscopic and microscopic metastases in comparison to controls. Similar, but significantly less potent, antitumor effect was observed also in mice treated with anti-GD2 immunoliposomes without HPR (anti-GD2-SIL-blank) or anti-GD2 MAb alone (p = 0.0297 and p = 0.0294, respectively, vs. anti-GD2-SIL-HPR). Moreover, our results clearly demonstrated that although anti-GD2 MAb had a strong antitumor effect in this in vivo NB model, 100% curability was obtained only after treatment with anti-GD2-SIL-HPR (p < 0.0001). Anti-GD2 liposomal HPR should receive clinical evaluation as adjuvant therapy of neuroblastoma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.081
Threshold uncertainty score0.356

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of CancerSame topicNeuroblastoma Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207