Quantitative modeling of reflected ultrasonic bounded beams and a new estimate of the Schoch shift
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The wavefields of bounded acoustic beams and pulses reflected from water-loaded plates are fully modeled with the phase advance technique. The wavefield produced at the source is propagated at any incidence angle using phase shift modeling that incorporates the full analytic solution for the acoustic reflectivity at the interface. This approach provides for the ready visualization of both the stationary monofrequency beam wavefield and animation of the temporally bounded pulse. The model images are reminiscent of the classic Schlieren photographs that first illustrated the nonspecular behavior of the reflected beams incident near critical angles. Various phenomena such as the lateral displacement and the null zone at the Rayleigh critical angle are recreated. A new approximation for this shift agrees well with that of the peak energy of the reflected beam. Similar effects are observed during the reflection of a bounded pulse. Although more computationally costly than existing analytic approximations, the phase advance technique can facilitate the interpretation of reflectivity measurements obtained in laboratory experiments. In particular, the full visualization allows for a better understanding of the behavior of reflected waves at any angle of incidence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it