Sodium Channel-blocking Agents Are Not of Benefit to Rats with Kaolin-induced Hydrocephalus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Hydrocephalus causes damage to periventricular white matter at least in part through chronic ischemia. The sodium channel-blocking agents mexiletine and riluzole have been shown to be of some protective value in various models of neurological injury. We hypothesized that these agents would ameliorate the effects of experimental childhood-onset hydrocephalus. METHODS: Hydrocephalus was induced in 4-week-old rats by injection of kaolin into the cisterna magna. Tests of cognitive and motor function were performed on a weekly basis. In a blinded and randomized manner, mexiletine (0.7, 7, or 42 mg/kg/d) or riluzole (1.4 or 13.6 mg/kg/d) was administered by osmotic minipump for 2 weeks, beginning 2 weeks after induction of hydrocephalus. The brains were then subjected to histopathological and biochemical analyses. RESULTS: Compared with untreated hydrocephalic rats, neither mexiletine nor riluzole was associated with a protective effect on behavioral, structural, or biochemical abnormalities. CONCLUSION: Protection of hydrocephalic brains through pharmacological sodium channel blockade is probably an approach not worth pursuing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".