MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2018274385 · doi:10.1109/apmc.2013.6695204

Novel substrate integrated waveguide (SIW) type high power amplifier using microstrip-to-SIW transition

2013· article· en· W2018274385 on OpenAlexaff
Zhebin Wang, Chan-Wang Park

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Rimouski
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrostripAmplifierImpedance matchingMaterials scienceWaveguideSubstrate (aquarium)Power (physics)OptoelectronicsElectrical impedanceElectrical engineeringElectronic engineeringEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a novel 10W substrate integrated waveguide (SIW) high power amplifier (HPA) designed with SIW matching network (MN) is presented. The SIW MN is connected with microstrip line using microstrip-to-SIW transition. An inductive metallized post in SIW is employed to realize impedance matching. At the fundamental frequency of 2.14 GHz, the impedance matching is realized by moving the position of the inductive metallized post in the SIW. Both the input and output MNs are designed with the proposed SIW-based MN concept. One SIW-based 10W HPA using GaN HEMT at 2.14 GHz is designed, fabricated, and measured. The proposed SIW-based HPA can be easily connected with any microstrip circuit with microstrip-to-SIW transition. Measured results show that the maximum power added efficiency (PAE) is 65.9 % with 39.8 dBm output power and the maximum gain is 20.1 dB with 30.9 dBm output power at 2.18 GHz. The size of the proposed SIW-based HPA is comparable with other microstrip-based PAs designed at the operating frequency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicrowave Engineering and WaveguidesFrench-language works237,207