Recent Developments in Crime Prevention and Safety Policies in Finland
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Finland's National Council for Crime Prevention (NCCP) was established in 1989. A national crime prevention program was adopted by the government in 1999. The program follows the "Nordic model" and includes a national coordinating and steering body that provides funding and advice to local crime prevention committees and projects. The Nordic model of crime prevention involves a strong affiliation to areas outside the justice system and strikes a balance between social and situational crime prevention. A member since 2001 of the European Crime Prevention Network (EUCPN), the NCCP selects projects to be presented at the EUCPN's annual Good Practice Conferences as well as competing for the annual European Crime Prevention Awards. The overt politicization of crime policy issues may cause some rethinking. The Nordic model may need to be complemented by other approaches, such as early intervention, other methods of social crime prevention, and a growing emphasis on creating networks, cooperation, and partnerships with many different actors with a stake in preventing crime.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it