MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Transplanted Mouse Embryonic Stem-Cell-Derived Motoneurons Form Functional Motor Units and Reduce Muscle Atrophy

2008· article· en· W2018288956 on OpenAlexafffund
Damien C. Yohn, Gareth B. Miles, Victor F. Rafuse, Robert M. Brownstone

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neuroscience · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMuscle Physiology and Disorders
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsDenervationEmbryonic stem cellNeuromuscular junctionBiologyAtrophyTransplantationMyocyteMuscle atrophyNeuroscienceStem cellMotor neuronReinnervationCell biologyCellAnatomySkeletal muscleInternal medicineMedicineBiochemistrySpinal cord

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Prolonged muscle denervation resulting from motor neuron (MN) damage leads to atrophy and degeneration of neuromuscular junctions (NMJs), which can impart irreversible damage. In this study, we ask whether transplanted embryonic stem (ES) cells differentiated into MNs can form functional synapses with host muscle, and if so what effects do they have on the muscle. After transplantation into transected tibial nerves of adult mice, ES-cell-derived MNs formed functional synapses with denervated host muscle, which resulted in the ability to produce average tetanic forces of 44% of nonlesioned controls. ES-cell-derived motor units (MUs) had mean force values and ranges similar to control muscles. The number of type I fibers and fatigue resistance of the MUs were increased, and denervation-associated muscle atrophy was significantly reduced. These results demonstrate the capacity for ES-cell-derived MNs not only to incorporate into the adult host tissue, but also to exert changes in the target tissue. By providing the signals normally active during embryonic development and placing the cells in an environment with their target tissue, ES cells differentiate into MNs that give rise to functional MU output which resembles the MU output of endogenous MNs. This suggests that these signals combined with those present in the graft environment, lead to the activation of a program intended to produce a normal range of MU forces.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.328
Threshold uncertainty score0.405

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations99
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of NeuroscienceSame topicMuscle Physiology and DisordersFrench-language works237,207