MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2018311108 · doi:10.3828/bjcs.2011.13

Writing heartlands and Nicole Brossard's <i>Hier</i>

2011· article· en· W2018311108 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ceri Morgan

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Canadian Studies · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGeographies of human-animal interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHort Innovation
KeywordsDiversity (politics)ConsciousnessSpace (punctuation)Ethnic groupLesbianAffect (linguistics)SociologyGender studiesPublic spaceAestheticsMedia studiesHistoryPolitical scienceAnthropologyArtEngineeringPsychologyArchitectural engineeringLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent years, Quebec's 'regions' have registered their presence morefully in the public consciousness, in response to issues such as economicvariation across the province and growing ethnic diversity outside ofMontreal. This article is part of a larger project on a consideration ofliterary representations of the province's secondary cities, towns andvillages, which seeks to problematise the relegation of these assecondary to an urban, specifically Montreal-based canon. It looks athow Nicole Brossard's novel, Hier (2001) mobilises particular culturalassociations with Quebec City to constitute this as a space of feminineand lesbian desire. In so doing, it plays on the connotations of the term'heartland' to think about how various mappings of affect or emotioncontribute to our experiencing of space and place.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.726
Threshold uncertainty score0.551

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0160.015
Scholarly communication0.0080.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of Canadian StudiesSame topicGeographies of human-animal interactionsFrench-language works237,207