MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2018344729 · doi:10.1108/sl-05-2013-0039

Continuous reconfiguration in the transient advantage economy

2013· article· en· W2018344729 on OpenAlexaff
Rita Gunther McGrath

Bibliographic record

VenueStrategy and Leadership · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic Development and Digital Transformation
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCompetitor analysisBusinessIndustrial organizationMarket capitalizationPopulationMarketingCompetitive advantageEconomicsStock marketContext (archaeology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose – The author identified a set of companies that have figured out how to cope, even to thrive, within the new transient advantage economy and explains how they did it. Design/methodology/approach – Her research team analyzed nearly 5,000 companies. Of that whole population, only ten companies were able to grow their net income by at least 5 percent a year for ten years in a row. These ten “outliers” have out-performed competitors while adapting to rapidly changing market forces. Findings – Organizations that have mastered transient-advantage environments have learned to continually free up resources from old advantages in order to fund the development of new ones. Additionally, innovation is continuous, mainstream and part of everyone's job. Research limitations/implications – The 5,000 companies analyzed included every publicly traded firm on any stock exchange with a market capitalization of over $1 billion. The article studies the practices of the ten most successful over ten years. Practical implications – The most successful firms, over the entire study period, had no dramatic downsizings, restructurings or sell-offs. Originality/value – The author found that the key leadership and management challenge is maintaining an organizational system that can manage the complementary forces of innovation and stability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.005
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.115
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.100 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStrategy and LeadershipSame topicEconomic Development and Digital TransformationFrench-language works237,207