MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2018371432 · doi:10.1117/12.686704

A comparison of soft-decision decoding algorithms for differential pulse-position modulation (DPPM) in optical wireless communications

2006· article· en· W2018371432 on OpenAlexaff
Ubolthip Sethakaset, T. Aaron Gulliver

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceDecoding methodsAlgorithmIntersymbol interferencePulse-position modulationOptical wirelessWirelessInterference (communication)Position (finance)Modulation (music)Channel (broadcasting)Pulse (music)TelecommunicationsPulse-amplitude modulationPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, differential pulse-position modulation (DPPM) over an indoor optical wireless link is represented as a Markov source transmitted over a finite-state machine channel. Then, the MAP, Max-Log-MAP and SOVA algorithms are employed for soft-decision decoding of DPPM. The error performance with intersymbol interference is evaluated and compared to hard-decision decoding and MLSD. It is shown that the performance of Max-Log-MAP and SOVA is closed to that of MLSD and MAP with lower complexity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.826
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicOptical Wireless Communication TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207