MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2018421965 · doi:10.1080/04419057.2003.9674312

Play: The Reproduction and Resistance of Dominant Gender Ideologies

2003· article· en· W2018421965 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Leisure Journal · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender Roles and Identity Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdeologyReproductionResistance (ecology)Social constructionismPerspective (graphical)Strict constructionismSociologySocial psychologyEmpirical researchGender studiesPsychologyPoliticsSocial scienceEpistemologyPolitical scienceEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper examines play and its impact on the resistance and reinforcement of gender ideologies. Using a social constructionist perspective, different types of play are considered to have different roles in the reproduction and reinforcement of gendered beliefs. Specifically two types of play are examined-unstructured and structured. Unstructured play tends to be guided by children themselves, whereas structured play, which includes media-related activities, is largely influenced by adult culture. It is argued that unstructured play may enable children to resist current gender ideologies, while structured play may be more conducive to reproducing gender stereotypes. The paper suggests the importance of recognizing the role that play may have in the social construction of gender. It is hoped that future empirical research will be conducted to compare specific contexts of play and their role in the reproduction and resistance of gender.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.465
Threshold uncertainty score0.742

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it