MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2018429898 · doi:10.1063/1.2161810

Ozone passivation of slow transient current collapse in AlGaN∕GaN field-effect transistors: The role of threading dislocations and the passivation mechanism

2006· article· en· W2018429898 on OpenAlexaff
D.W. DiSanto, Haifeng Sun, C. R. Bolognesi

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Letters · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSemiconductor materials and devices
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPassivationTransistorMaterials scienceDislocationOptoelectronicsDielectricWide-bandgap semiconductorSurface statesField-effect transistorCondensed matter physicsNanotechnologySurface (topology)Composite materialElectrical engineeringPhysicsVoltageLayer (electronics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Current collapse in AlGaN∕GaN field-effect transistors subjected high rf drive levels and/or to bias stresses is attributed to the presence of surface trapping levels whose nature remains to be identified. Although current collapse manifestations can be alleviated with various surface films, the exact passivation mechanism remains a matter of debate. We show that slow transient current collapse can be eliminated by a short ozone exposure, unambiguously tying current collapse to the sample surface, without invoking strain or dielectric encapsulation arguments. We assert that the surface states responsible for slow collapse arise where dislocations intersect the sample surface, and propose an alternative current collapse mechanism wherein individual dislocation lines result in multiple discrete virtual gates that locally deplete the transistor channel access regions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.297

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Physics LettersSame topicSemiconductor materials and devicesFrench-language works237,207