MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2018439297 · doi:10.1117/12.872895

Mono-crystalline silicon strips grown by liquid phase epitaxy for photovoltaic applications

2010· article· en· W2018439297 on OpenAlexafffund
Bo Li, Adrian Kitai

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSilicon and Solar Cell Technologies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMcMaster University
KeywordsEpitaxySiliconMaterials scienceCrystalline siliconSubstrate (aquarium)OptoelectronicsSTRIPSLayer (electronics)Monocrystalline siliconNanotechnologyComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have studied epitaxial lateral overgrowth of p-type silicon by Liquid Phase Epitaxy (LPE) on n-type (111) silicon substrates from a Si/In melt. The substrate had a silicon dioxide mask with a set of parallel opening windows for seed lines which were aligned along a [211]direction. The growth parameters, morphology and electrical properties of the grown crystal were studied. Two single crystalline silicon strips were formed on one single seed line, one strip on either side of the seed line, demonstrating that silicon is more likely to deposit near the interface between the silicon and the oxide. All facets of the strips are {111} planes and therefore the bottom surface has a 4 degree angle with the substrate, providing convenience for the epitaxial layer to be peeled off from the substrate and used for potential photovoltaic applications. Monte Carlo random walk model is used to simulate the epitaxial growth of the mono-crystalline strips.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.122
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicSilicon and Solar Cell TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207