Process of Economic Terms Internationalization (By Materials of the German, Russian and Tatar Languages)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The paper presents the characteristics of internationalisms in the economic terminology of German, Russian and Tatar languages. The emergence of borrowings in economic terminology is stimulated by the process of globalization, and is the result of cooperation between the countries. Successful achievements in this field are the property of many countries. Borrowings in the economic sphere are international, possible to be allocated into comparable and non-comparable areas. The emergence of non-comparable area in the studied languages is due to cultural and historical conditions of their functioning. In the process of using international vocabulary the issues of semantic inaccuracy and irrational use of words may arise. All borrowed lexemes are subject to formal and functional assimilation in languages. Materials research can be used in the teaching of German, Russian and Tatar languages, as well as in the teaching of subjects such as Terminology, comparative linguistics and lexicology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it