Single-image super-resolution based on Markov random field and contourlet transform
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Learning-based methods are well adopted in image super-resolution. In this paper, we propose a new learning-based approach using contourlet transform and Markov random field. The proposed algorithm employs contourlet transform rather than the conventional wavelet to represent image features and takes into account the correlation between adjacent pixels or image patches through the Markov random field (MRF) model. The input low-resolution (LR) image is decomposed with the contourlet transform and fed to the MRF model together with the contourlet transform coefficients from the low- and high-resolution image pairs in the training set. The unknown high-frequency components/coefficients for the input low-resolution image are inferred by a belief propagation algorithm. Finally, the inverse contourlet transform converts the LR input and the inferred high-frequency coefficients into the super-resolved image. The effectiveness of the proposed method is demonstrated with the experiments on facial, vehicle plate, and real scene images. A better visual quality is achieved in terms of peak signal to noise ratio and the image structural similarity measurement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".