MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2018490650 · doi:10.1107/s0907444902004201

Crystallization and preliminary X-ray analysis of the hydroperoxidase I C-terminal domain from<i>Escherichia coli</i>

2002· article· en· W2018490650 on OpenAlexaff
X. Carpena, Alba Guarné, Juan C. Ferrer, Pedro M. Alzari, Ignacio Fita, P.C. Loewen

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicEnzyme-mediated dye degradation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEscherichia coliCrystallizationCrystallographyChemistryProtein crystallizationResidue (chemistry)BiochemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hydroperoxidases (HP) are normally large haem-containing bifunctional enzymes capable of acting as both catalases and peroxidases. The C-terminal domain of HPI from Escherichia coli (KatG), extending from residue Tyr422 to Leu726, was found to be resistant to trypsin proteolysis. The segment of katG encoding this domain was cloned and overexpressed to produce a haemless protein that is soluble even at concentrations above 30 mg ml(-1). This protein shows a 25% sequence identity with cytochrome c peroxidase (CCP) from Saccharomyces cerevisae, despite lacking the characteristic catalytic and iron-binding residues. Crystals from this protein were grown in 0.6 M sodium citrate buffered to pH 7.5 with HEPES by the hanging-drop vapour-diffusion method at 293 K. These crystals diffracted beyond 2.0 A resolution and belong to space group P2(1)2(1)2(1), with unit-cell parameters a = 84.2, b = 98.7, c = 302.8 A. Three pseudo-origin peaks in the Patterson maps indicate an unusual packing compatible with the presence of three molecules in the crystal asymmetric unit and a solvent content of about 80% by volume.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Crystallographica Section D Biological CrystallographySame topicEnzyme-mediated dye degradationFrench-language works237,207