Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le texte propose un cadre théorique qui permet d’analyser l’effet de la légitimité sur le devenir d’une minorité. Selon ce modèle, la légitimité externe n’est pas toujours garante d’une forte légitimité interne. Le cadre théorique permet d’analyser des rapports de force qui influent sur la légitimité des minorités linguistiques non seulement par des pressions externes observables, mais aussi par la pénétration dans l’imaginaire intime de chaque individu. L’ article présente des résultats sur le métissage identitaire, phénomène déjà bien évident et observable chez une majorité des membres des communautés francophones et acadiennes. Les francophones semblent être influencés par deux discours légitimant en opposition, c’est-à-dire par l’idéologie dominante qui accorde la préséance à la légitimité culturelle de la langue anglaise, et concomitamment par des expériences de solidarité avec le groupe francophone qui renforcent un discours de légitimité de solidarité favorable à la francophonie.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.021 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".