Effects of barley grain processing and dietary ruminally degradable protein on urea nitrogen recycling and nitrogen metabolism in growing lambs1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of this study was to determine how interactions between dietary ruminally degradable protein (RDP) level and ruminally fermentable carbohydrate (RFC) alter urea N transfer to the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) and the utilization of this recycled urea N in rapidly growing lambs fed high-N diets. Four Suffolk ram lambs (34.8 +/- 0.5 kg of BW) were used in a 4 x 4 Latin square design with 21-d periods and a 2 x 2 factorial arrangement of dietary treatments. The dietary factors studied were 1) dry-rolled vs. pelleted barley as the principal source of RFC and 2) dietary levels of RDP of 60 vs. 70% (% of CP). All diets contained 28.8 g of N/kg of DM. Experimental diets were composed of 80% concentrate mixture and 20% barley silage (DM basis) and were fed twice daily at 0900 and 1700 as total mixed rations. Nitrogen balance was measured from d 15 to 20, and urea N kinetics were measured from d 15 to 19 using intrajugular infusions of [(15)N(15)N]-urea. Nitrogen intake (P = 0.001) and fecal (P = 0.002) and urinary (P = 0.03) N excretion increased as dietary RDP level increased, but the method of barley processing had no effect. Feeding dry-rolled compared with pelleted barley (P = 0.04) as well as feeding 60% RDP compared with 70% RDP (P = 0.04) resulted in a greater N digestibility. Whole-body N retention was unaffected (P >/= 0.74) by dietary treatment. Dietary treatment had no effect on endogenous production of urea N and its recycling to the GIT; however, across dietary treatments, endogenous production of urea N (45.8 to 50.9 g/d) exceeded N intake (42.3 to 47.9 g/d). Across dietary treatments, 30.6 to 38.5 g/d of urea N were recycled to the GIT, representing 0.67 to 0.74 of endogenous urea N production; however, 0.64 to 0.76 of urea N recycled to the GIT was returned to the ornithine cycle. In summary, although dietary treatment did not alter urea N kinetics, substantial amounts of hepatic urea N output were recycled to the GIT under the dietary conditions used in this study, and additional research is required to determine how this recycled urea N can be efficiently captured by bacteria within the GIT.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".