MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2018539624 · doi:10.3917/lautr.031.0049

De Saigon à Sainte-Livrade-sur-Lot, l'épopée des rapatriés d'Indochine. 1956-2009

2010· article· fr· W2018539624 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dominique Rolland

Bibliographic record

VenueL Autre · 2010
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Résumé En 1956, à la fin de la guerre d’Indochine, les accords de Genève prévoient le rapatriement en France des citoyens français. Parmi eux, beaucoup de familles eurasiennes : la présence de nombreux militaires et de fonctionnaires célibataires explique les concubinages fréquents, et le nombre important d’enfants métis, généralement non-reconnus. À Sainte-Livrade dans le Lot et Garonne, 1200 personnes rapatriées dont 700 enfants de moins de quatorze ans furent hébergées dans un camp militaire. Il s’agissait principalement de femmes seules avec les enfants eurasiens qu’elles avaient eu d’un concubin français – mais lui-même souvent issu d’autres colonies - du Maghreb, des Antilles, d’Afrique subsaharienne, du Pacifique ou de l’Océan Indien – et de quelques couples, en minorité. Il reste encore aujourd’hui une centaine de ces premiers arrivants dans le camp. Les femmes ont conservé leurs habitudes, alors qu’avec plus ou moins de difficultés, les jeunes générations ont dans l’ensemble réussi leur intégration. Ils continuent cependant de s’interroger sur leur identité métisse, alors que le camp est voué à une disparition prochaine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.178
Threshold uncertainty score0.354

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueL AutreSame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207