Thermodynamic Properties of Dilute Aluminum in Liquid Zinc
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The thermodynamic properties of the liquid zinc-aluminum system in the range of 0 to 0.36 mole fraction of aluminum and over a temperature range of 430 to 530 °C were investigated by using an electromotive force (EMF) cell of the typeAl(s)|LiCl–KCl–AlCl3|Zn–Al(l),MoThe activity of aluminum was found to show a significant positive deviation from Raoultian behaviour. The activity coefficient of aluminum in the dilute solution range (γ°) and the free energy of solution of aluminum based on the one weight percent (1 wt %) standard state were determined as a function of temperature and found to follow the relationships:logγ°=(1195/T)−0.874ΔGs=5457−11.4T (cal/mole)Over the temperature range investigated, the self-interaction coefficient of aluminum in liquid zinc (eAlAl) was found to be approximately constant at −0.01.On a étudié les propriétés thermodynamiques du système liquide zinc-aluminium, entre 0 et 0.36 fraction molaire d'aluminium, à des températures de 430 à 530 °C, en utilisant une cellule à force électromotrice (FEM) du type:Al(s)|LiCl–KCl–AlCl3|Zn–Al(l),MoOn a trouve que l'factivite de l'faluminium montrait une deviation positive importante du comportement Raoultien. On a determine le coefficient d'factivite, γ°, de l'faluminium pour une solution diluee ainsi que l'fenergie libre de solution de l'faluminium, base sur l'fetat standard de un pour-cent en poids (1%), en fonction de la temperature. On a trouve que ceux-ci suivaient les relations suivantes:logγ°=(1195/T)−0.874ΔGs=5457−11.4T (cal/mole)Dans le domaine de température étudié, on a trouvé que le coefficient d'auto-interaction de l'aluminium dans le zinc liquide (eAlAl) était approximativement constant à −0.01.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".