Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans l'arrêt Nicholson rendu en 1979, la Cour suprême reconnaissait sans ambages l'existence au Canada d'une obligation d'agir équitablement incombant aux organismes administratifs. Plus d'une dizaine d'années plus tard, malgré une abondante jurisprudence et littérature sur le sujet, les contours de la notion d'équité demeurent encore flous pour plus d'un juriste. Afin de mieux circonscrire la portée et définir la nature de cette obligation, les auteurs offrent une synthèse et une analyse de la jurisprudence canadienne selon les principaux domaines ou secteurs du droit où cette notion a été développée et appliquée, en particulier, les organismes publics chargés de faire enquête, ceux dont la décision affectent le droit d'une personne d'exercer sa profession et les institutions carcérales.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.014 | 0.023 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.024 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.013 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.011 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".