Alignment Control of Self-Assembled Organosiloxane Films Derived from Alkyloligosiloxane Amphiphiles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Transparent and continuous organosiloxane films with macroscopically oriented mesostructures were prepared by dip-coating a substrate, on which a rubbing-treated polyimide film is formed, with hydrolyzed solutions of oligosiloxane precursors (C(n)H(2n+1)Si(OSi(OMe)(3))(3)). The structure of the films depends on the alkyl chain length of the precursors such that films with two-dimensional (2D) hexagonal and lamellar structures are obtained when n = 10 and 16, respectively. In the 2D hexagonal film, the cylindrical organic moieties are aligned perpendicular to the rubbing direction in the plane of the film over the whole film thickness. On the other hand, the lamellar film changes its orientation with increased distance from the substrate surface. While the orientation of the lamellae at the surface of the film is parallel to the film-air interface, they are perpendicularly aligned in the vicinity of the substrate with the layer normal parallel to the rubbing direction. The observed unique orientation of the mesostructures is attributed to the anisotropic hydrophobic interactions between the alkyl chains of the hydrolyzed oligosiloxane molecules and the polymer chains of the polyimide layer oriented by the rubbing treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".