MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2018615286 · doi:10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.4.637

Rescue of the Pseudo-Vitamin D Deficiency Rickets Phenotype of CYP27B1-Deficient Mice by Treatment With 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3: Biochemical, Histomorphometric, and Biomechanical Analyses

2003· article· en· W2018615286 on OpenAlexaff
Olivier Dardenne, José Prud'Homme, S. Adam Hacking, Francis H. Glorieux, René St‐Arnaud

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Bone and Mineral Research · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVitamin D Research Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityShriners Hospitals for Children - Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRicketsOsteomalaciaVitamin D and neurologyInternal medicineEndocrinologySecondary hyperparathyroidismvitamin D deficiencyCalcitriolHyperparathyroidismPhenotypeMedicineBiologyCalciumParathyroid hormoneGeneBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The treatment of choice for pseudo-vitamin D deficiency rickets (PDDR), caused by mutations in the 25-hydroxyvitamin D-1alpha-hydroxylase (CYP27B1; 1alpha-OHase) gene, is replacement therapy with 1,25(OH)2D3. We have previously engineered an animal model of PDDR by targeted inactivation of the 1alpha-OHase gene in mice. Replacement therapy was performed in this model. The 1alpha-OHase-/- mice and heterozygote controls were treated with 500 pg of 1,25(OH)2D/g body weight/day for 2 weeks, followed by 100 pg of 1,25(OH)2D3/g body weight/day for an additional 3 weeks before death at 8 weeks of age. Blood biochemistry analysis revealed that the rescue treatment corrected the hypocalcemia and secondary hyperparathyroidism. The daily injections of 1,25(OH)2D3 induced strong expression of CYP24, the 25-hydroxyvitamin D 24-hydroxylase gene. Bone histology and histomorphometry confirmed that the rickets and osteomalacia were cured. The rescue regimen also restored the biomechanical properties of the bone tissue within normal parameters. These results show that chronic treatment with the active 1,25(OH)2D3 metabolite is effective to rescue the PDDR phenotype of 1alpha-OHase mutant mice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.096
Threshold uncertainty score0.443

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations109
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Bone and Mineral ResearchSame topicVitamin D Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207