MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2018627399 · doi:10.1093/imanum/drt025

GMRES convergence bounds that depend on the right-hand-side vector

2013· article· en· W2018627399 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueIMA Journal of Numerical Analysis · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMatrix Theory and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsGeneralized minimal residual methodMathematicsEigenvalues and eigenvectorsInvertible matrixDiagonalizable matrixApplied mathematicsResidualConvergence (economics)Rank (graph theory)SolverKrylov subspaceLinear systemCombinatoricsMathematical analysisMathematical optimizationPure mathematicsAlgorithmSymmetric matrix

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider the convergence of the algorithm GMRES of Saad and Schultz for solving linear equations Bx=b, where B ∈ ℂn × n is nonsingular and diagonalizable, and b ∈ ℂn. Our analysis explicitly includes the initial residual vector r0. We show that the GMRES residual norm satisfies a weighted polynomial least-squares problem on the spectrum of B, and that GMRES convergence reduces to an ideal GMRES problem on a rank-1 modification of the diagonal matrix of eigenvalues of B. Numerical experiments show that the new bounds can accurately describe GMRES convergence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.806
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it