MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Situación y avances tecnologicos en la producción bananera mundial

2011· article· es· W2018648149 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Brasileira de Fruticultura · 2011
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBanana Cultivation and Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtGeographyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El consumo de banano como fruta fresca, supera a todas las demás frutas,solo superado por el consumo de cítricos industriales. El grupo Cavendish es el de mayor produccion en el mundo, com um 47 %, principalmente de los clones Gran Enano(Nanica) y Valery(Nanicao). El Gros Michel representa en el mundo 12 % de la producción, los plátanos de consumo cocido, grupo AAB un 17 %, mientras que los plátanos de tierras altas, conocidos como dulces, cultivados em las regiones tropicales como en el sur de Brasil, norte de Argentina , Islas Canárias y tierras altas de Filipinas han mostrado una gran aceptación. Es el grupo de Prata`. Las importaciones de banano em 2009 fueran de 14,5 miliones de ton, por Europa, EUA-Canada, Japon y otros países. Los principales países exportadores Equador, Filipinas, Costa Rica y otros.La banana orgânica tiene los mejores precios.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.420
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it