MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2018691527 · doi:10.1021/ie010926v

Separation of Ethylene Glycol−Water Mixtures Using Sulfonated Poly(ether ether ketone) Pervaporation Membranes:  Membrane Relaxation and Separation Performance Analysis

2002· article· en· W2018691527 on OpenAlexaff
Robert Y. M. Huang, Xiao Feng, William A. Anderson

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMembrane Separation and Gas Transport
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPervaporationMembraneEthylene glycolChemical engineeringSorptionEtherMembrane technologyPolymer chemistryAqueous solutionChemistryMaterials scienceChromatographyPermeationOrganic chemistryAdsorption

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pervaporation separation of ethylene glycol aqueous solutions was carried out using sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone) homogeneous membranes. Membrane relaxation in separation processes was observed and alleviated by heat treatment. The heat-treated pervaporation membranes experience further relaxation in the separation process by the swelling interactions of the feed mixtures before steady-state transport is reached. Membrane performance is investigated in terms of sorption and pervaporation separation. The preferential sorption and diffusion of water in the membranes were observed. Membrane performance can be interpreted by the modified solution-diffusion model, which takes into account the plasticization interaction of the transporting species in the membrane. Some parameters in this model were estimated by fitting the related experimental data. The benefit of using pervaporation for ethylene glycol dehydration is discussed in terms of energy consumption.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations63
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry ResearchSame topicMembrane Separation and Gas TransportFrench-language works237,207