Non-wetting behaviour of tungsten carbide powders in nickel weld pool: new loss mechanism in GMAW overlays
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a new mechanism, observed directly for the first time, to explain low carbide fractions in Ni–WC overlays produced with GMAW. In this loss mechanism, a significant amount of powder loss is a consequence of the non-wetting behaviour of tungsten carbide. High speed videography and quantitative metallography of weld deposits are used to identify this mechanism. The non-wetting mechanism found acts simultaneously with the carbide dissolution mechanism, which until now was the only suggested cause of low carbide fraction in GMAW Ni–WC overlays. The non-wetting behaviour is observed in both short circuit and free flight metal transfer, accounting for carbide losses between 20 and 70% in the experiments performed. Low carbide fraction has prevented the mainstream use of GMAW for Ni–WC overlays, despite the advantages of simplicity, capability of in situ repair, and low capital costs. The findings presented here have a potential large impact for further consumable and process development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it