MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2018764785 · doi:10.3899/jrheum.110900

Psychiatric Disorders in Patients with Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases: Prevalence, Association with Disease Activity, and Overall Patient Well-being

2011· review· en· W2018764785 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
John R. Walker, Lesley A. Graff, Jan Dutz, Çharles N. Bernstein

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Rheumatology Supplement · 2011
Typereview
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicTryptophan and brain disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaSKiN HealthUniversity of British ColumbiaManitoba HealthSt. Boniface Hospital
FundersLEO PharmaMichael Smith Health Research BCCrohn's and Colitis FoundationAmgenCrohn's and Colitis Foundation of CanadaAstraZenecaChild and Family Research InstituteCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchAbbott CanadaAstraZeneca CanadaJanssen CanadaAmgen Canada
KeywordsMedicineDepression (economics)DiseaseAnxietyCohortPsychiatryAffect (linguistics)ImmunologyClinical psychologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There has been much speculation on the importance of emotional factors in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory disease (IMID); it is only in the past 10 years that well designed, large-cohort studies have been able to clarify this relationship. This article provides an overview of evidence on the occurrence of depression and anxiety in IMID, and the role of these comorbidities as risk factors for onset of IMID, as well as the degree to which they affect the course of disease and treatment outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations49
Published2011
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Rheumatology SupplementSame topicTryptophan and brain disordersFrench-language works237,207