Mondialisation et négociation sociale dans les entreprises multinationales : la négociation de l'accord mondial Quebecor World
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Résumé Si les négociations collectives nationales et locales demeurent le pivot des systèmes de relations professionnelles, de nouveaux processus de négociation se développent au sein des entreprises multinationales sous la forme des accords-cadres internationaux (ACI). Les ACI constituent pour les fédérations syndicales internationales (FSI) signataires une reconnaissance de la contribution des salariés et de leurs organisations représentatives à la responsabilité sociale des entreprises (RSE). L’importance croissante des ACI suscite de multiples interrogations portant d’abord sur les caractéristiques des processus de négociation collective internationale menant à de tels accords, mais également sur les modèles théoriques permettant de les analyser. Partant de ces constats, cet article vise un double objectif soit, sur le plan empirique, de documenter le processus de négociation d’un ACI et, sur le plan théorique, d’évaluer à la lumière de cette étude de cas la pertinence de la théorie classique de Walton et McKersie (1965) comme cadre d’analyse des processus de négociation internationale.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".