MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2018804581 · doi:10.1109/syscon.2013.6549941

A new efficient algorithm for tracking LEO satellites

2013· article· en· W2018804581 on OpenAlexaff
Ahmad Khanlari, Fatemeh Mansourkiaie

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSpace Satellite Systems and Control
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSatelliteTracking (education)AlgorithmSatellite trackingPosition (finance)TracingLow earth orbitTracking systemOrbital mechanicsReal-time computingKalman filterArtificial intelligenceAerospace engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The methods of tracking Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellites can be grouped into two different categories: “signal-based” and “program-based” methods. In this paper, we employ a new program-based tracking method to trace satellites, using Two Line orbital Elements (TLE). Using TLE is a simple and well-known method for tracking satellites; however, this paper presents a new algorithm for tracking satellites, based on TLE files. This algorithm, uses an available TLE file to estimate the satellite's position and to update the orbital elements, for any desired time that we are interested in tracing the satellite. The results show that the algorithm is accurate and reliable.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.988
Threshold uncertainty score0.425

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpace Satellite Systems and ControlFrench-language works237,207