Estimation of Gas Adsorption Capacity in Coal: A Review and an Analytical Study
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Adsorption plays an important role in carbon dioxide sequestration and methane recovery processes in deep coal seams. If the effects of coal physical properties on its gas adsorption capacity are considered, it increases with vitrinite content and pressure and reduces with liptinite, mineral matter, moisture contents, and temperature and follows a U-shaped variation with carbon content. Furthermore, CO2 has higher adsorption capacity compared to other gases. There are two main methods to estimate the amount of gas adsorbed in a coal seam, which are called direct and indirect methods. The latter method is more common for coal. In the direct method, the volume of gas released from a coal mass into a sealed desorption canister is measured, and under the indirect method, adsorption isotherms and empirical relations are used. However, any of those methods are unable to count the effect of swelling-induced strain and, therefore, fail in measuring the absolute adsorption in coal. Moreover, among various adsorption models, Langmuir and Dubnin-Radushkevich (D-R) equations are the most widely using models. However, since gas can be absorbed through both adsorption and absorption processes for coal, it is important to have an additional term to count the missing absorption mechanism in both the Langmuir and D-R models. Finally, a new descriptive model for gas adsorption capacity of coal as a function of effective factors is proposed. The new model is based on the existing D-R equation, which was modified by inserting a new expression for the term of micropore capacity. Two types (CO2 and N2) of gas adsorption data for coal from five different locations (British Colombia and Alberta in Canada and Victoria, Sydney and Bowen in Australia) at three different temperatures (273, 296.5, and 318 K) were considered for the model development. According to the model results, new gas adsorption equations can fairly well accurately predict the adsorption capacity in coal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it