MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2018809865 · doi:10.1080/19392699.2011.614298

Estimation of Gas Adsorption Capacity in Coal: A Review and an Analytical Study

2011· review· en· W2018809865 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
M.S.A. Perera, P.G. Ranjith, S.K. Choi, David Airey, Philipp Weniger

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Coal Preparation and Utilization · 2011
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCoal Properties and Utilization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdsorptionCoalMethaneLangmuirChemistryDesorptionVitriniteCoalbed methaneVolume (thermodynamics)Microporous materialAbsorption (acoustics)Petroleum engineeringActivated carbonThermodynamicsCoal miningEnvironmental scienceMaterials scienceGeologyOrganic chemistryComposite materialPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Adsorption plays an important role in carbon dioxide sequestration and methane recovery processes in deep coal seams. If the effects of coal physical properties on its gas adsorption capacity are considered, it increases with vitrinite content and pressure and reduces with liptinite, mineral matter, moisture contents, and temperature and follows a U-shaped variation with carbon content. Furthermore, CO2 has higher adsorption capacity compared to other gases. There are two main methods to estimate the amount of gas adsorbed in a coal seam, which are called direct and indirect methods. The latter method is more common for coal. In the direct method, the volume of gas released from a coal mass into a sealed desorption canister is measured, and under the indirect method, adsorption isotherms and empirical relations are used. However, any of those methods are unable to count the effect of swelling-induced strain and, therefore, fail in measuring the absolute adsorption in coal. Moreover, among various adsorption models, Langmuir and Dubnin-Radushkevich (D-R) equations are the most widely using models. However, since gas can be absorbed through both adsorption and absorption processes for coal, it is important to have an additional term to count the missing absorption mechanism in both the Langmuir and D-R models. Finally, a new descriptive model for gas adsorption capacity of coal as a function of effective factors is proposed. The new model is based on the existing D-R equation, which was modified by inserting a new expression for the term of micropore capacity. Two types (CO2 and N2) of gas adsorption data for coal from five different locations (British Colombia and Alberta in Canada and Victoria, Sydney and Bowen in Australia) at three different temperatures (273, 296.5, and 318 K) were considered for the model development. According to the model results, new gas adsorption equations can fairly well accurately predict the adsorption capacity in coal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0060.007
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.158
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations119
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Coal Preparation and UtilizationSame topicCoal Properties and UtilizationFrench-language works237,207