Bibliographic record
Abstract
Histoire et didactique de la traduction - Selon l'auteur, la traduction ne peut devenir une discipline autonome dans le cadre universitaire que si elle fonde son identité sur la traductologie et la didactique. Le problème qui se pose dès lors est celui de la formation des enseignants et du contenu didactique de la traduction. Cet article explore la didactique de la traduction sous l'angle historique en passant en revue un certain nombre de précurseurs: notamment Gaspard de Tende (1660), Ferri de Saint-Constant (1811) renvoyant aux auteurs de l'Antiquité, Charles Rollin (1838)... Et l'auteur se demande comment il se fait que les didacticiens du XXe siècle aient eu l'impression que tout commençait avec eux, quand en réalité c'est à une renaissance que l'on assiste depuis les années 1950 (la Stylistique comparée du français et de l'anglais publiée en 1958 constituant l'événement symbolique de cette renaissance) beaucoup plus qu'à une véritable naissance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.050 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".