Whose Gospel?: A Concise Guide to Progressive Protestantism (review)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reviewed by: Whose Gospel?: A Concise Guide to Progressive Protestantism Cara Burnidge Forbes, James A., Jr. Whose Gospel?: A Concise Guide to Progressive Protestantism. New York: The New Press, 2010. 176 pp. $23.95 (USD). ISBN: 978-1-59558-397-0. In this slim volume, Reverend Dr. James A. Forbes Jr. faces six controversial subjects—sexuality, gender, race, poverty, war, and the environment—in order to outline the contours of a Progressive Protestantism in the twenty-first century. Written especially for fellow practitioners, Whose Gospel? reads like a gentle yet resolute exhortation. In his forward, Bill Moyers highlights the context in which Forbes writes by reminding readers of the terror induced on September 11, 2001. Moyers situates Forbes against the startling words of conservative Christians such as Pat Robertson, Jerry Falwell, and Ann Coulter who noted the wrath of God and condemned Islam; Forbes, in contrast, opened his church to all faiths and exhorted Christians to ecumenical thought and action. Forbes invites his readers "to join a spiritual awakening in our nation" (1) through confrontation with and reflection on the most contentious issues facing American Christianity. Wasting no time, chapter one takes readers on "A Lifelong Course in Sexuality," emphasizing the fluidity of authoritative sources and the importance of individual experience. While Scripture and Christian fellowship shape the boundaries of what behaviors are permissible, Forbes insists that individual sexuality must be balanced by freedom on one hand and responsibility on the other. Although the first chapter is explicitly about sexual orientation (and Forbes contends that "our sexual orientation is a gift of God's creativity" [43]), this and subsequent chapters provide an implicit directive about proper authority. Falling in line with the history of progressive Christian theologians in America, Forbes explains that authority is not "fixed" to one tradition, a single institution, or even particular passages in the Bible; instead, religious authorities belong within the individual and his or her attention to "the Spirit" (42). This principle manifests itself in the following chapters as Forbes lends his interpretation to contemporary topics. For instance, chapter two, "Gender Equality: For God's Sake and Ours," provides a brief contemporary history of the increasingly accepted use of gender-neutral or inclusive language, yet also notes that "the changes in language and worship have not been taken seriously enough" (53). Chapter three, "Which Gospel Do You Believe About Race," continues this theme as Forbes critiques the continued persistence of what he calls "race religion." Centering on his own personal experiences with racial difference, prejudice, and the Gospel, Forbes prompts readers to recall the ways in which Christianity was—and, at times, is—used to claim superior status over others. He contends, "We [still] stand at two gospels about race—the gospel of racial exceptionalism and the gospel of human race equality of being" (93). Like with gendered language, race exceptionalism can be used by the "in" group to describe the attributes of God, passively claiming superior status and assigning inferiority to other people and groups. Forbes encourages the continued revision of gendered and racial language to actualize a more inclusive human experience. [End Page 469] In chapter four, "Economic Justice: Are All the Children In?," Forbes proclaims in no uncertain terms that Christianity is on the side of economic justice, including universal health care. Forbes compares the Christian ethic of love to his mother's dinner routine. Just as she always prepared a plate for family members missing from the dinner table before serving those present, Forbes exhorts readers to be compassionate and considerate of those less fortunate. In a nation still struggling with the 2008 economic collapse, he urges equity and a gospel of "enough"—not wanting or receiving more than what is "enough." Chapter six, "Critique, Confession, and Ecological Consciousness," examines the ecological role the Church can play. From appreciating God's creation on the Sabbath day to seeking eco-justice, Christians must, Forbes argues, apply the Golden Rule to all of God's creation, human and non-human. This same message continues in the epilogue as Forbes encourages readers to consider themselves a part of an Abrahamic tradition that is not insulated to Christianity, but rather is inclusive of other traditions...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.028 | 0.016 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".