MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2018839128 · doi:10.1162/leon.2000.33.2.148c

<i>Stairways to the Stars: Skywatching in Three Great Ancient Cultures</i> by Anthony Aveni. Wiley, New York, NY, U.S.A., 1997, 1999. 230 pp. Paper, $15.95. ISBN: 0-471-32976-2.

2000· article· en· W2018839128 on OpenAlexaffabout
David Topper

Bibliographic record

VenueLeonardo · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical and Architectural Studies
Canadian institutionsResearch Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIconCitationArt historyArtLibrary scienceWorld Wide WebComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

April 01 2000 Stairways to the Stars: Skywatching in Three Great Ancient Cultures Stairways to the Stars: Skywatching in Three Great Ancient Cultures by AnthonyAveni. Wiley, New York, NY, U.S.A., 1997, 1999. 230 pp. Paper, $15.95. ISBN: 0-471-32976-2. David Topper David Topper 272 Oxford Street, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3M 3J7 Canada. E-mail: Topper@UWinnipeg.ca.br. Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Author and Article Information David Topper 272 Oxford Street, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3M 3J7 Canada. E-mail: Topper@UWinnipeg.ca.br. Online ISSN: 1530-9282 Print ISSN: 0024-094X © 2000 ISAST2000 Leonardo (2000) 33 (2): 148–150. https://doi.org/10.1162/leon.2000.33.2.148c Cite Icon Cite Permissions Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Search Site Citation David Topper; Stairways to the Stars: Skywatching in Three Great Ancient Cultures. Leonardo 2000; 33 (2): 148–150. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/leon.2000.33.2.148c Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentAll JournalsLeonardo Search Advanced Search This content is only available as a PDF. © 2000 ISAST2000 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.357
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLeonardoSame topicHistorical and Architectural StudiesFrench-language works237,207