MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2018880304 · doi:10.1029/2007gl033063

Current broadening as a mechanism for anticyclogenesis at the Northwest Corner of the North Atlantic Current

2008· article· en· W2018880304 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
William Woityra, T. Rossby

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Research Letters · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicOceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersU.S. Naval Research LaboratoryNational Science Foundation
KeywordsEddyCurrent (fluid)GeologyOceanographyFront (military)Boundary currentVortexSubductionFlow (mathematics)Ocean currentClimatologyMeteorologyPaleontologyMechanicsTurbulencePhysicsTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The warm North Atlantic Current, flowing north just east of the Grand Banks, makes an abrupt turn to the east near 51°N. As the waters flow through this region, known as the Northwest Corner, the current broadens and weakens, effectively splitting into two zonal yet variable flows forming what is generally known as the Subpolar Front. The Northwest Corner also has the curious property that it expands and expels anticyclonic vortices on a quasi‐regular basis, approximately every 2‐1/2 months. Using an energy budget approach we show that this anticyclogenesis can be accounted for in terms of a kinetic energy convergence due to the broadening of the flow as it passes through the region. The principal export route for the newly formed eddies appears to be density‐driven subduction, i.e. sinking, driven by severe heat‐loss due to the exposed position of these warm waters in the southern Labrador Sea.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Research LettersSame topicOceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesFrench-language works237,207