MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2018896309 · doi:10.2202/1542-6580.1003

Numerical Investigation for Optimal Phase Holdup of a Continuous Reactor for Hydrogenation of Nitrile Butadiene Rubber

2003· article· en· W2018896309 on OpenAlexafffund
Qinmin Pan, Garry L. Rempel

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFuel Cells and Related Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsNitrileNatural rubberNitrile rubberContinuous reactorMaterials sciencePhase (matter)Mass transferChemical engineeringFlow (mathematics)Coupling (piping)Process (computing)ChemistryOrganic chemistryComposite materialCatalysisMechanicsChromatographyEngineeringComputer sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The effect of phase holdup on reactor behaviour has been investigated so that a proper reactor for a continuous process for hydrogenation of nitrile butadiene rubber can be developed. Detailed numerical analysis has been carried out, taking the coupling between the hydrogenation kinetics and reactor flow behaviours into account. The suitable liquid holdup and gas liquid mass transfer behaviour for the hydrogenation process of nitrile butadiene rubber are discussed, and the optimal reactor structure and operation conditions are suggested.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Chemical Reactor EngineeringSame topicFuel Cells and Related MaterialsFrench-language works237,207