MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2018928883 · doi:10.2307/3552334

The Marketization of Social Security

2002· article· en· W2018928883 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Michael J. Prince, John R. Dixon, Mark Hyde

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Public Policy · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHousing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMarketizationSocial securityBusinessPolitical scienceChinaLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Preface Welfare Ideology, the Market and Social Security: Toward a Typology of Market-Oriented Reform by Mark Hyde and John Dixon The Market Appropriation of Statutory Social Security: Global Experiences and Governance Issues by John Dixon and Alexander Kouzmin Chile's Pioneering Privatization by Silvia Borzutzky The Market Orientation of Social Security: The Brazilian Case by Sonia Mirian Draibe and Milko Matijascic Marketization of Sickness and Disability Insurance in the Netherlands: A Review of the Polder Route by Ruud Muffels and Henk-Jan Dirven The Forms of Privatization of Social Security in Britain by Carol Walker A Hydra-Like Creature? The Marketization of Social Security in New Zealand by Michael O'Brien Almost 12 People an Hour Leaving Welfare: The Marketization of Welfare in Ontario and the Decline of the Public Good by Hugh Shewell Why Privatization Is Not on the United States' Social Security Policy Agenda by Max J. Skidmore An Assessment of the Marketization of Social Security in Zimbabwe by Edwin Kaseke Index

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.952
Threshold uncertainty score0.096

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0040.006
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Public PolicySame topicHousing, Finance, and NeoliberalismFrench-language works237,207