Bibliographic record
Abstract
The more or less direct representation of life stories which characterized many feminist plays in Québec in the 1970s and 1980s opened paths toward a richly creative range of dramaturgical and performative strategies making innovative uses of narration and narrators. Women's voices, speaking or writing about girls' and women's real experiences (outside stereotypes and taboos), demanded to be heard on stage starting in the 1970s. While explicit biography and autobiography in Québec women's theater have grown muted, voices telling stories (usually those of individuals previously silenced or rendered invisible through established theater convention), drawing spectators' attention to elements in the story, functioning as narrators, and speaking from one of various layers of spaces between fiction and reality are now heard in a number of plays by women. Since narration has not been a primary device in traditions of theatrical representation, it is interesting to study some of the innovative and effective ways in which women have been dramatizing their corporeal presence and their coming to voice in scenically congenial contexts, along with their ways of seeing and knowing the world through their women's eyes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".