MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2018946478 · doi:10.1109/iembs.2010.5626781

A novel morphology-based classifier for automatic detection of epileptic seizures

2010· article· en· W2018946478 on OpenAlexaff
Rajeev Yadav, Rajeev Agarwal, M. N. S. Swamy

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectroencephalographyRhythmEpilepsyEpileptic seizurePattern recognition (psychology)Computer scienceClassifier (UML)Artificial intelligenceNeuroscienceMedicinePsychologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Most of the automatic seizure detection schemes reported in the literature are complex for detecting seizures that are of (a) short duration, (b) minimal amplitude evolution, or (c) non-rhythmic mixed frequency epileptic activity. We present a novel morphology-based classifier to detect epileptic seizures for intracranial EEG recording. The method characterizes epileptic seizure by detecting continual presence of sharp half-waves in the EEG. Performance is evaluated on single channel intracranial EEG of seven patients, and compared to two previously developed methods for intracranial EEG recordings by our research group. The method detects seizure of varying types (rhythmic, non-rhythmic, short- and long- seizures) with a sensitivity of 100%, a false detection rate of 0.1/h and an average onset delay of 9.1 s. The method outperforms the two previously developed methods and is computationally simple for real-time application. Preliminary results on seven patients data are very promising.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.166
Threshold uncertainty score0.297

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesFrench-language works237,207